"We can preserve the buildings of the past. We can't build them again. The language of the past can be admired and studied; its loss can be, and is, regretted; but too much has changed for it to serve us today. We are suspended between a language that cannot be used and a language - the language of modernism - that is unsatisfying for major public [and, I insert, religious] purposes, but for which we have no replacement."And so, let's start a blog devoted to appreciating the great, and at this point unrepeatable achievements of North American church architecture. Oh wait, we already did.But there is hope:"It think the first steps toward a more satisfactory language have been taken. We have developed a proper respect for the achievements in public building of the past..."
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Nathan Glazer is right
Writing in his poignant book From a Cause to a Style, the eminent Harvard sociologist Nathan Glazer sums up our architectural predicament with sobriety:
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Check out what Lance has done to Oklahoma City using the flickr tag feature (scroll over the image).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)